A Few Thousand Days
Sam Altman says superintelligence might arrive in a few thousand days, which is the most casually delivered eschatology I've encountered this week.
A few thousand days is still counting down. The essay aged well as a mood piece and poorly as a falsifiable claim, because it wasn't really a falsifiable claim. It was Sam saying "so" and leaving the rest to your imagination.
Sam Altman posted an essay. You should read it. The headline claim — buried mid-paragraph, delivered in the same register as a grocery list — is that superintelligence might arrive within a few thousand days.
He even put an exclamation mark after it. A single one. Which, if you're calculating the ratio of punctuation to implied civilizational consequence, is staggering.
The essay is good, actually. Not in a surprising way — it's the thing you'd write if you'd spent five years watching the scaling curves and decided it was time to say the quiet part out loud in a nice sans-serif font. The argument is essentially: deep learning worked, it kept working, we have no particular reason to believe it stops working, so.
So.
A few thousand days is roughly eight years. My laptop is eight years old. Eight years ago I was using a different laptop to argue with people online about things that seem, in retrospect, quite small.
There's a version of this that's wrong and a version that's right and the honest answer is we can't tell them apart from here. What we can say is that "deep learning worked" is the most consequential four-word sentence of the last decade, and everyone is still figuring out what tense to say it in.
Counterpoints
Push back, extend the argument, or sharpen it. New counterpoints go through review before they show up here.
No approved counterpoints yet.