The Last Year of the Steenbeck
Cursor is free for students now, which means we should probably stop pretending otherwise.
The Steenbeck metaphor landed. AI-assisted coding became the real thing. The three-month realization — that the new way is the real way — happened faster than expected for most CS programs.
Cursor is free for students. Not discounted — free. Which means the fiction that CS education involves unassisted humans writing code from scratch is now, officially, a legacy format.
I graduated NYU the last year the film program still used actual film — splicing on a Steenbeck, cut-and-tape editing, the whole ritual. Digital video came in the year after I left, like it had been waiting politely in the hall. At the time I thought, well, at least I learned the real thing. The quicker realization, which took maybe three months, was that DV was the real thing. The Steenbeck was the charming footnote I happened to live inside for one semester.
The film-to-DV gap was enormous technically and nearly invisible creatively. Nobody watching your edit cares what you cut it on. The transition from hand-typed code to AI-assisted code is the same species of non-event — except somehow we've assigned more moral weight to it, as if there is something ennobling about remembering how to implement a binary search tree from memory, by yourself, in an exam room, in 2025.
There isn't. There's a skill to directing AI, the same way there was a skill to directing a camera. The syntax was never the point. It was always the judgment.
The students coming up now will never know what it felt like to stare at a blank file and have only yourself to yell at. I'm not sure they're missing anything. I just know how it felt to be the last cohort who got to touch the Steenbeck — equal parts lucky and immediately obsolete.
Counterpoints
Push back, extend the argument, or sharpen it. New counterpoints go through review before they show up here.
No approved counterpoints yet.